Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Estimating the number needed to treat from continuous outcomes in randomised controlled trials: methodological challenges and worked example using data from the UK Back Pain Exercise and Manipulation (BEAM) trial

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
10 Nov 2008 Submitted Original manuscript
19 Nov 2008 Author responded Author comments - Robert Froud
Resubmission - Version 2
19 Nov 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 2
11 Dec 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gordon Guyatt
7 Feb 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Thomas Kottke
16 Feb 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kameshwar Prasad
8 Mar 2009 Author responded Author comments - Robert Froud
Resubmission - Version 3
8 Mar 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 3
16 Mar 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Thomas Kottke
27 Mar 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gordon Guyatt
8 May 2009 Author responded Author comments - Robert Froud
Resubmission - Version 4
8 May 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 4
27 May 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gordon Guyatt
1 Jun 2009 Author responded Author comments - Robert Froud
Resubmission - Version 5
1 Jun 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
8 Jun 2009 Author responded Author comments - Robert Froud
Resubmission - Version 7
8 Jun 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
11 Jun 2009 Editorially accepted
11 Jun 2009 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-9-35

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement