This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Identifying strategies to maximise recruitment and retention of practices and patients in a multicentre randomised controlled trial of an intervention to optimise secondary prevention for coronary heart disease in primary care
© Leathem et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009
Received: 04 February 2009
Accepted: 19 June 2009
Published: 19 June 2009
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|4 Feb 2009||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|27 Feb 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Graham Watt|
|4 Mar 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Peter Murchie|
|18 Apr 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Mary Byrne|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|18 Apr 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|5 May 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Peter Murchie|
|7 May 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Graham Watt|
|8 Jun 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Mary Byrne|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|8 Jun 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|15 Jun 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Mary Byrne|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|15 Jun 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|19 Jun 2009||Editorially accepted|
|19 Jun 2009||Article published||10.1186/1471-2288-9-40|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.