Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Are we drawing the right conclusions from randomised placebo-controlled trials? A post-hoc analysis of data from a randomised controlled trial

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
3 Dec 2008 Submitted Original manuscript
27 Dec 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Paul Enck
29 Dec 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Bruce Wampold
27 Feb 2009 Author responded Author comments - Margaret Diana van Die
Resubmission - Version 2
27 Feb 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 2
31 Mar 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Paul Enck
15 Apr 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Bruce Wampold
2 May 2009 Author responded Author comments - Margaret Diana van Die
Resubmission - Version 3
2 May 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
5 May 2009 Author responded Author comments - Margaret Diana van Die
Resubmission - Version 6
5 May 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 6
16 Jun 2009 Author responded Author comments - Margaret Diana van Die
Resubmission - Version 7
16 Jun 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
23 Jun 2009 Editorially accepted
23 Jun 2009 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-9-41

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement