Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Combining estimates of interest in prognostic modelling studies after multiple imputation: current practice and guidelines

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
11 Mar 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
29 Apr 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Chiu-Hsieh (Paul) Hsu
10 May 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Stef van Buuren
15 May 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Hakan Demirtas
4 Jun 2009 Author responded Author comments - Andrea Marshall
Resubmission - Version 3
4 Jun 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 3
23 Jun 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Hakan Demirtas
7 Jul 2009 Author responded Author comments - Andrea Marshall
Resubmission - Version 4
7 Jul 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 4
16 Jul 2009 Author responded Author comments - Andrea Marshall
Resubmission - Version 5
16 Jul 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
28 Jul 2009 Editorially accepted
28 Jul 2009 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-9-57

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement