Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
9 Mar 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
6 Apr 2009 Author responded Author comments - James Thomas
Resubmission - Version 2
6 Apr 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 2
13 May 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mark Rodgers
21 May 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Helen J Smith
21 May 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rosaline Barbour
11 Jun 2009 Author responded Author comments - James Thomas
Resubmission - Version 3
11 Jun 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 3
29 Jun 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Helen J Smith
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
3 Aug 2009 Author responded Author comments - James Thomas
Resubmission - Version 5
3 Aug 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
5 Aug 2009 Author responded Author comments - James Thomas
Resubmission - Version 7
5 Aug 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Resubmission - Version 8
Submitted Manuscript version 8
10 Aug 2009 Author responded Author comments - James Thomas
Resubmission - Version 9
10 Aug 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 9
Publishing
11 Aug 2009 Editorially accepted
11 Aug 2009 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-9-59

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement