Skip to main content

Table 4 Unadjusted mean difference from baseline to follow-up for outcomes by treatment group and recruitment method

From: Comparing recruitment strategies in a study of acupuncture for chronic back pain

 

Acupuncture

Usual care

Test for interaction of treatment group and recruitment method

Follow-up Interval

Outcome

 

Mailed Letter

Magazine Advertisement

 

Mailed Letter

Magazine Advertisement

 
  

Mean

 

Mean

 

Mean

 

Mean

 
 

N

(95% CI)

N

(95% CI)

N

(95% CI)

N

(95% CI)

 

8-week

         

Symptom bothersomeness

144

-1.8 (-2.3, -1.4)

81

-1.6 (-2.2, -1.0)

41

-0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)

30

-1.5 (-2.5, -.05)

0.82

RMDQ

144

-3.8 (-4.7, -2.9)

82

-3.3 (-4.4, -2.1)

41

-0.9 (-2.3, +0.5)

30

-2.3 (-3.7, -1.0)

0.99

26-week

         

Symptom bothersomeness

143

-1.3 (-1.8, -0.8)

82

-1.6 (-2.3, -1.0)

40

-1.4 (-2.2, -0.5)

29

-1.4 (-2.5, -0.3)

0.30

RMDQ

143

-3.5 (-4.4, -2.5)

82

-3.8 (-4.8, -2.8)

40

-2.5 (-4.1, -1.0)

29

-2.5 (-4.2, -0.7)

0.25

52-week

         

Symptom bothersomeness

140

-1.4 (-1.9, -0.9)

80

-1.8 (-2.4, -1.1)

38

-1.5 (-2.4, -0.6)

30

-1.3 (-2.2, -0.3)

0.20

RMDQ

140

-3.5 (-4.4, -2.7)

80

-4.1 (-5.1, -3.1)

38

-3.2 (-4.7, -1.8)

30

-2.4 (-4.4, -0.4)

0.17

  1. Note: main effect of recruitment method is not significant in any of the models
  2. Abbreviation: RMDQ, Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire