Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Estimating required information size by quantifying diversity in random-effects model meta-analyses

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
15 May 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
6 Aug 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rebecca Turner
21 Aug 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gerta Rücker
24 Sep 2009 Author responded Author comments - Jørn Wetterslev
Resubmission - Version 2
24 Sep 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 2
23 Oct 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gerta Rücker
12 Nov 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Rebecca Turner
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
28 Dec 2009 Author responded Author comments - Jørn Wetterslev
Resubmission - Version 4
28 Dec 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
30 Dec 2009 Editorially accepted
30 Dec 2009 Article published 10.1186/1471-2288-9-86

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement