Estimating required information size by quantifying diversity in random-effects model meta-analyses
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|15 May 2009||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|6 Aug 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rebecca Turner|
|21 Aug 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Gerta Rücker|
|24 Sep 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Jørn Wetterslev|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|24 Sep 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|23 Oct 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Gerta Rücker|
|12 Nov 2009||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Rebecca Turner|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|28 Dec 2009||Author responded||Author comments - Jørn Wetterslev|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|28 Dec 2009||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|30 Dec 2009||Editorially accepted|
|30 Dec 2009||Article published||10.1186/1471-2288-9-86|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.