Skip to main content

Table 4 Recruitment barriers and enablers reported by GPs in free text boxes

From: Barriers and facilitators to patient recruitment to a cluster randomized controlled trial in primary care: lessons for future trials

Theme

Example

Patient level barriers (perceived by GP)

Ā 

Patient unwilling to participate

ā€œPatients who were well controlled on [Diskus] and Turbuhalers were very reluctant to change over to Seretide [Advair] MDI and about 3 patients refused to enter study for this reason.ā€

Patients unavailable to participate

ā€œSome patients were geographically unavailable: [they worked as fly-in-fly-out employees in mines in Western Australia], some changed address.ā€

GP level recruitment barriers

Ā 

Few eligible patients perceived by GP

ā€œI don't think you could have done any more. I guess most of my patients have well-controlled asthma!ā€

Difficulty prioritizing research due to perceived demands of study or time constraints

ā€œYou did a lot to assist recruitment. The excessive amounts of work involved put us off the desire. We then did not give much effort.ā€

Confusion about recruitment information

ā€œWhen invited to participate I agreed because I had patients on Symbicort and Seretide. Unfortunately by the time I entered the study only Seretide was an option. I was not prepared to swap patients off Symbicort (my drug of choice).ā€*

Study thought to be too intellectual or confronting for patients

ā€œI feel your program is too intellectual for ordinary patients who find instructions too difficult and give up & avoid anything too confronting and being shown up by other parties is unhelpful.ā€

Confusion around disease diagnosis and management

ā€œAsthma/COAD i.e. Patient was diagnosed with asthma in the past and later diagnosed with COAD by specialist.ā€

Practice/organization level barriers

Ā 

GP not empowered to recruit within a group practice

ā€œI had a poster in my [office], this did result in some patients volunteering when they read [the] notice (our waiting room is very large and we are prohibited to putting up such posters).ā€

ā€œAs I am a new GP here I could not/did not try to recruit other doctor's patients into the study. I did not want to take other doctors patients unless they spontaneously moved to see meā€.

Study level barriers

Ā 

Need for more recruitment support

ā€œIf a personnel from MICA was sent to help with recruitment that will be a great help for us or for future sites.ā€

Study materials needed in languages other than English

ā€œI have a lot of patients with limited English, explanation (how to use spacer etc.) in [a language] other than English will help for some.ā€

Lack of incentive for patient

ā€œIt was very hard to convince the patients to participate. [There was] not much incentive.ā€

GP level recruitment enablers

Ā 

Good recruitment support

ā€œNo! The support and induction processes were excellent.ā€

Study perceived as beneficial to GPs practice

ā€œMICA study was beneficial personally in learning some new techniques and also had satisfaction [in] that it helped my patients in many ways to improve control and understand their condition.ā€

  1. *Note - there was no change in the inclusion criteria; the need to switch patients taking another medication at entry was clearly stated during the workshop and in the study materials.