Assessing fidelity to treatment delivery in the ICONS (Identifying Continence OptioNs after Stroke) cluster randomised feasibility trial

Table 2 Results for fidelity to treatment delivery in the ICONS trial

Trial arm	Intervention^a	Supported implementation
Number of clinical logs analysed	396	320
Number of patients	40	31
Percentage of total number of patients	24.4 % (40/164)	24.8 % (31/125)
Percentage of clinical logs according to type of regime: Prompted Voiding (PV)/Bladder Training (BT)	PV: 90.4 %	PV: 100.0 %
	/BT: 9.6 %	/BT: 0.0 %
STAGE 1: % with voiding interval present and correctly documented	83.3	89.4
STAGE 2: % with both voiding interval and schedule of proposed voiding times present and correctly documented	38.9	31.9
No. of clinical logs that achieved both Stage 1 and Stage 2	154	102
For the clinical logs that achieved both Stage 1 and Stage 2:
STAGE 3: On average, how often was an ‘actual voiding time’ documented that was within 30 min of the proposed voiding time?^b	54.8 %	56.0 %
STAGE 4a: On average, how often was encouragement documented as given?	58.4 %	57.5 %
STAGE 4b: On average, how often was it documented that the patient had been asked if they were wet?^c	57.9 %	65.9 %

^aThis refers to sites which delivered the intervention only, and not the supported implementation package
^bOccasions on which a clinically justifiable explanation was given for an early/late/missing actual voiding time were exempted from this analysis
^cThis applies to Prompted Voiding clinical logs only

ISSN: 1471-2288