Skip to main content

Table 3 Spin in the abstracts of published articles

From: Classification and prevalence of spin in abstracts of non-randomized studies evaluating an intervention

Spin categories

Presence of at least one example of spin in the abstract

n = 128

At least one spin in the abstract

107 (84.0)

Misleading reporting

 

 Not reporting adverse events or lack of focus on harm

34 (26.6)

 Selective reporting

15 (11.8)

 Misleading description of study designs

1 (0.8)

 Use of linguistic spin or “hype”

33 (25.8)

Inadequate interpretation

 

 Claim an effect for non-statistically significant results

7 (5.5)

 Claim equivalence for non-statistically significant results

13 (10.2)

 Ruling out safety when results are not statistically significant

15 (11.8)

  Causal language or causal claim

68 (53.1)

 Claim any difference despite no comparison test performed

1 (0.8)

 Focus on statistical significance instead of clinical relevance

1 (0.8)

Inadequate extrapolation

 

 Inadequate extrapolation to larger population, intervention or outcome

11 (8.6)

 Inadequate implications for clinical practice

25 (19.5)

 Other

5 (3.9)

  1. Data are no. (%)