This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
The use of purposeful sampling in a qualitative evidence synthesis: A worked example on sexual adjustment to a cancer trajectory
© Benoot et al. 2016
Received: 14 July 2015
Accepted: 22 January 2016
Published: 18 February 2016
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|14 Jul 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|4 Oct 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Yi Guo|
|12 Oct 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Pavlina Andreeva-Gateva|
|26 Nov 2015||Author responded||Author comments - charlotte Benoot|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|26 Nov 2015||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|13 Dec 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Yi Guo|
|21 Dec 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Pavlina Andreeva-Gateva|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|22 Jan 2016||Editorially accepted|
|18 Feb 2016||Article published||10.1186/s12874-016-0114-6|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.