This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
The art and science of study identification: a comparative analysis of two systematic reviews
© Rosen and Suhami. 2016
Received: 8 October 2015
Accepted: 2 February 2016
Published: 24 February 2016
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|8 Oct 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|12 Nov 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Matthew Page|
|26 Nov 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ba' Pham|
|30 Nov 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Adrienne Stevens|
|7 Jan 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Laura Rosen|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|7 Jan 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|2 Feb 2016||Editorially accepted|
|24 Feb 2016||Article published||10.1186/s12874-016-0118-2|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.