Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Validation and reliability of a guideline appraisal mini-checklist for daily practice use

  • Andrea Siebenhofer1, 2Email author,
  • Thomas Semlitsch1,
  • Thomas Herborn2,
  • Ulrich Siering3,
  • Ina Kopp4 and
  • Johannes Hartig5
BMC Medical Research MethodologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201616:39

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0139-x

Received: 12 November 2015

Accepted: 22 March 2016

Published: 2 April 2016

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
12 Nov 2015 Submitted Original manuscript
7 Feb 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Melissa Brouwers
17 Feb 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Shingai Machingaidze
25 Feb 2016 Author responded Author comments - Andrea Siebenhofer
Resubmission - Version 2
25 Feb 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
14 Mar 2016 Author responded Author comments - Andrea Siebenhofer
Resubmission - Version 3
14 Mar 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
18 Mar 2016 Author responded Author comments - Andrea Siebenhofer
Resubmission - Version 4
18 Mar 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
22 Mar 2016 Editorially accepted
2 Apr 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12874-016-0139-x

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Institute of General Practice and Evidence-Based Health Services Research, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
(2)
Institute of General Practice, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
(3)
Institute for Quality and Efficiency in Health Care (IQWiG), Cologne, Germany
(4)
Association of Scientific Medical Societies’ Institute of Medical Knowledge Management (AWMF-IMWi), Marburg, Germany
(5)
Department of Educational Quality and Evaluation, German Institute for International Educational Research (DIPF), Frankfurt, Germany

Advertisement