This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Exploring how individuals complete the choice tasks in a discrete choice experiment: an interview study
- Jorien Veldwijk†1, 2, 3Email author,
- Domino Determann†1, 4,
- Mattijs S. Lambooij1,
- Janine A. van Til5,
- Ida J. Korfage4,
- Esther W. de Bekker-Grob4 and
- G. Ardine de Wit1, 2
© Veldwijk et al. 2016
Received: 8 July 2015
Accepted: 1 April 2016
Published: 21 April 2016
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|8 Jul 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|2 Jan 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Sebastian Heidenreich|
|11 Jan 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Daniel Rigby|
|11 Mar 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Jorien Veldwijk|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|11 Mar 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|23 Mar 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Jorien Veldwijk|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|23 Mar 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|1 Apr 2016||Editorially accepted|
|21 Apr 2016||Article published||10.1186/s12874-016-0140-4|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.