Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Bias of health estimates obtained from chronic disease and risk factor surveillance systems using telephone population surveys in Australia: results from a representative face-to-face survey in Australia from 2010 to 2013

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
9 Dec 2015 Submitted Original manuscript
15 Jan 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Helen Sullivan
9 Feb 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kelly Blake
24 Mar 2016 Author responded Author comments - Eleonora Dal Grande
Resubmission - Version 2
24 Mar 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
25 Feb 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Helen Sullivan
17 Mar 2016 Author responded Author comments - Eleonora Dal Grande
Resubmission - Version 3
17 Mar 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
31 Mar 2016 Author responded Author comments - Eleonora Dal Grande
Resubmission - Version 4
31 Mar 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
8 Apr 2016 Editorially accepted
18 Apr 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12874-016-0145-z

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement