Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Patient enrollment and logistical problems top the list of difficulties in clinical research: a cross-sectional survey

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
26 Aug 2015 Submitted Original manuscript
12 Oct 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Judith Arnetz
19 Oct 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Donald Willison
20 Oct 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - James Wright
26 Nov 2015 Author responded Author comments - Stéphane Cullati
Resubmission - Version 2
26 Nov 2015 Submitted Manuscript version 2
14 Dec 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Judith Arnetz
13 Mar 2016 Author responded Author comments - Stéphane Cullati
Resubmission - Version 3
13 Mar 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
22 Mar 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Judith Arnetz
8 Apr 2016 Author responded Author comments - Stéphane Cullati
Resubmission - Version 4
8 Apr 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
26 Apr 2016 Editorially accepted
4 May 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12874-016-0151-1

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement