This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Factors relating to participation in follow-up to the 45 and up study in Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal individuals
© Gubhaju et al. 2016
Received: 19 November 2015
Accepted: 5 May 2016
Published: 11 May 2016
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|19 Nov 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|18 Feb 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Xiuyun Wu|
|18 Feb 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Deborah Glass|
|26 Feb 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Pavlina Andreeva-Gateva|
|8 Apr 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Lina Gubhaju|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|8 Apr 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|25 Apr 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Lina Gubhaju|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|25 Apr 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|5 May 2016||Editorially accepted|
|11 May 2016||Article published||10.1186/s12874-016-0155-x|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.