This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Using the modified Delphi method to establish clinical consensus for the diagnosis and treatment of patients with rotator cuff pathology
© Eubank et al. 2016
Received: 21 November 2015
Accepted: 14 May 2016
Published: 20 May 2016
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|21 Nov 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|23 Feb 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Johanna Taylor|
|10 Mar 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Bionka Huisstede|
|18 Mar 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Pavlina Andreeva-Gateva|
|28 Mar 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Breda Eubank|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|28 Mar 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|18 Apr 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Johanna Taylor|
|21 Apr 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Breda Eubank|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|21 Apr 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|9 May 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Johanna Taylor|
|11 May 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Breda Eubank|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|11 May 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|14 May 2016||Editorially accepted|
|20 May 2016||Article published||10.1186/s12874-016-0165-8|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.