This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Should we embed randomized controlled trials within action research: arguing from a case study of telemonitoring
© The Author(s). 2016
Received: 1 December 2015
Accepted: 28 May 2016
Published: 8 June 2016
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|1 Dec 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|30 Dec 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ingeborg Zehbe|
|5 Jan 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Johanna Taylor|
|10 Feb 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Karen Day|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|10 Feb 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|17 Mar 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Johanna Taylor|
|23 Apr 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Karen Day|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|23 Apr 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|9 May 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Karen Day|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|9 May 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|28 May 2016||Editorially accepted|
|8 Jun 2016||Article published||10.1186/s12874-016-0175-6|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.