This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Time to publication among completed diagnostic accuracy studies: associated with reported accuracy estimates
© The Author(s). 2016
Received: 4 March 2016
Accepted: 28 May 2016
Published: 6 June 2016
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|4 Mar 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|10 Apr 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Paul-Christian Bürkner|
|14 Apr 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Iosief Abraha|
|10 May 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Daniël Korevaar|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|10 May 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|12 May 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Paul-Christian Bürkner|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|28 May 2016||Editorially accepted|
|6 Jun 2016||Article published||10.1186/s12874-016-0177-4|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.