Skip to main content

Table 3 Experimental factors associated with the difference to be detected to control pain in mild trauma injuries presented as an absolute risk difference and as odds ratios

From: How do researchers determine the difference to be detected in superiority trials? Results of a survey from a panel of researchers

 

Difference to be detected

Difference to be detected expressed as odds ratio

Factors tested

Mean gain in pain controla, % (95 % CI)

P-value

Mean odds ratio (95 % CI)

P-value

Baseline risk

 

<0.001

 

0.017

 Low risk (90 % of controlled pain) (n = 186)

 High risk (50 % of controlled pain) (n = 184)

6.0 (4.9–7.1)

16.0 (14.9–17.1)

2.3 (2.1–2.5)

2.0 (1.9–2.2)

Study population

 

0.065

 

0.082

 Adults (n = 188)

 Children (n = 182)

10.3 (9.2–11.3)

11.7 (10.6–12.8)

2.1 (1.9–2.2)

2.3 (2.1–2.4)

Difficulties to recruit patients in the trial

 

0.111

 

0.029

 No difficulty to recruit patients (n = 183)

 Difficulties to recruit patients (n = 187)

10.3 (9.3–11.4)

11.6 (10.5–12.7)

2.0 (1.9–2.2)

2.3 (2.1–2.5)

Disadvantages of the new treatment

 

0.135

 

0.123

 Risk of minor digestive side effects (n = 183)

 Risk of severe allergic reactions (n = 187)

10.4 (9.3–11.5)

11.6 (10.5–12.6)

2.1 (1.9–2.2)

2.2 (2.1–2.4)

  1. 95 % CI 95 % confidence interval
  2. aMarginal means from the multivariable linear regression model