Table 3 Process and consensus evaluation for three focus group participants (n = 30)

Was the priority setting group scheduled and conducted in a way that enabled you to fully participate?

28

93

2

7

-

-

-

-

Did the project team clearly communicate information associated with the priority setting process?

25

83

5

17

-

-

-

-

Were adequate resources and time allocated to properly completing the priority setting process?

24

80

5

17

1

3

-

-

Would you be willing to participate in future priority setting activities?

22

73

7

23

-

-

1

3

Was this priority setting process beneficial in terms of identifying gaps in your local area?

21

70

8

27

-

-

1

3

Consensus

-

-

Do you agree with the priorities that have been identified via this process?

22

73

7

23

-

-

1

3

In your opinion, are the priorities selected during this process representative of the broader views of cancer care stakeholders in your local area?

20

67

10

33

-

-

-

-

Will participation in this priority setting process lead to any changes within your organisation?

6

20

16

54

1

3

7

23