Skip to content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Description and initial evaluation of incorporating electronic follow-up of study participants in a longstanding multisite cohort study

  • Kiarri N. Kershaw1Email author,
  • Kiang Liu1,
  • David C. GoffJr.2,
  • Donald M. Lloyd-Jones1,
  • Laura J. Rasmussen-Torvik1,
  • Jared P. Reis3,
  • Pamela J. Schreiner4,
  • Daniel B. Garside5 and
  • Stephen Sidney6
BMC Medical Research MethodologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201616:125

Received: 4 May 2016

Accepted: 17 September 2016

Published: 23 September 2016

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting

Original Submission
4 May 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
Author responded Author comments
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
17 Sep 2016 Editorially accepted
23 Sep 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12874-016-0226-z

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Preventive Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, USA
Department of Epidemiology, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, USA
Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Bethesda, USA
Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, Minneapolis, USA
Department of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, USA
Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Oakland, USA