Skip to content

Advertisement

BMC Medical Research Methodology

What do you think about BMC? Take part in

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Improving prediction models with new markers: a comparison of updating strategies

  • D. Nieboer1Email author,
  • Y. Vergouwe1,
  • Danna P. Ankerst2, 3,
  • Monique J. Roobol4 and
  • Ewout W. Steyerberg1
BMC Medical Research MethodologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201616:128

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0231-2

Received: 15 June 2016

Accepted: 20 September 2016

Published: 27 September 2016

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
15 Jun 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
Author responded Author comments
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Publishing
20 Sep 2016 Editorially accepted
27 Sep 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12874-016-0231-2

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center Rotterdam
(2)
Department of Mathematics, Technical University Munich
(3)
University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
(4)
Department of Urology, Erasmus MC-University Medical Center Rotterdam

Advertisement