Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research article
  • Open Access
  • Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Differences in reported sepsis incidence according to study design: a literature review

  • Saga Elise Mariansdatter1Email author,
  • Andreas Halgreen Eiset1,
  • Kirstine Kobberøe Søgaard1 and
  • Christian Fynbo Christiansen1
Contributed equally
BMC Medical Research MethodologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201616:137

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0237-9

Received: 27 April 2016

Accepted: 29 September 2016

Published: 12 October 2016

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
27 Apr 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
Author responded Author comments
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Publishing
29 Sep 2016 Editorially accepted
12 Oct 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12874-016-0237-9

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark

Advertisement