Skip to content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Comparing two sampling methods to engage hard-to-reach communities in research priority setting

  • Melissa A. Valerio1,
  • Natalia Rodriguez2,
  • Paula Winkler2, 3,
  • Jaime Lopez4,
  • Meagen Dennison5,
  • Yuanyuan Liang2, 6 and
  • Barbara J. Turner2, 7Email author
BMC Medical Research MethodologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201616:146

Received: 8 July 2016

Accepted: 8 October 2016

Published: 28 October 2016

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting

Original Submission
8 Jul 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
Author responded Author comments
Reviewed Reviewer Report
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
8 Oct 2016 Editorially accepted
28 Oct 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12874-016-0242-z

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

Department of Health Promotion and Behavioral Science, University of Texas School of Public Health in San Antonio, San Antonio, USA
Center for Research to Advance Community Health (ReACH), University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio (UTHSCSA), San Antonio, USA
South Central Area Health Education Center (AHEC), UTHSCSA, San Antonio, USA
Frio County AgriLife Extension, Pearsall, USA
Karnes County AgriLife Extension, Karnes City, USA
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, UTHSCSA, San Antonio, USA
Department of Medicine, UTHSCSA, San Antonio, USA