This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Multiple and mixed methods in formative evaluation: Is more better? Reflections from a South African study
© The Author(s). 2016
Received: 10 June 2016
Accepted: 1 December 2016
Published: 15 December 2016
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|10 Jun 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|16 Aug 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Martina Feilzer|
|25 Aug 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Orri Massimiliano|
|5 Nov 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Willem Odendaal|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|5 Nov 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|10 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Orri Massimiliano|
|24 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Martina Feilzer|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|1 Dec 2016||Editorially accepted|
|15 Dec 2016||Article published||10.1186/s12874-016-0273-5|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.