Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Clinical prediction in defined populations: a simulation study investigating when and how to aggregate existing models

  • Glen P. Martin1Email author,
  • Mamas A. Mamas1, 2,
  • Niels Peek1, 3,
  • Iain Buchan1, 3 and
  • Matthew Sperrin1
BMC Medical Research MethodologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:1

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0277-1

Received: 17 August 2016

Accepted: 15 December 2016

Published: 6 January 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
17 Aug 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
21 Sep 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Annamaria Guolo
24 Sep 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - George Lambrou
29 Sep 2016 Author responded Author comments - Glen Martin
Resubmission - Version 2
29 Sep 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
13 Oct 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Annamaria Guolo
14 Dec 2016 Author responded Author comments - Glen Martin
Resubmission - Version 3
14 Dec 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
15 Dec 2016 Editorially accepted
6 Jan 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12874-016-0277-1

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Health e-Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
(2)
Keele Cardiovascular Research Group, Keele University, Stoke-on-Trent, UK
(3)
NIHR Greater Manchester Primary Care Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

Advertisement