Skip to main content

Table 3 Performance results for exposure E, datasets of 10,000 observationsa

From: Outcome-sensitive multiple imputation: a simulation study

  

% miss

A

B

Cb

Db

Eb

Fb

Gb

H

MCAR

Mean biasc

20

0.001

−0.089

−0.003

−0.008

−0.006

−0.003

−0.006

−0.413

40

−0.005

−0.181

−0.016

−0.024

−0.009

−0.016

−0.021

−0.419

60

−0.017

−0.268

−0.027

−0.035

−0.017

−0.028

−0.032

−0.421

80

−0.021

−0.343

−0.023

−0.036

−0.033

−0.027

−0.032

−0.418

Mean errorc

20

0.064

0.094

0.059

0.059

0.060

0.059

0.059

0.413

40

0.088

0.182

0.071

0.072

0.071

0.070

0.071

0.419

60

0.135

0.268

0.094

0.094

0.088

0.094

0.095

0.421

80

0.270

0.343

0.150

0.144

0.148

0.148

0.143

0.418

Coverage

20

0.962

0.792

0.959

0.965

0.948

0.959

0.959

0.000

40

0.946

0.439

0.954

0.946

0.958

0.954

0.952

0.000

60

0.943

0.291

0.956

0.931

0.965

0.958

0.939

0.007

80

0.952

0.394

0.952

0.929

0.950

0.949

0.929

0.137

Power

20

1.000

1.000

1.000

1.000

1.000

1.000

1.000

0.983

40

1.000

1.000

1.000

1.000

1.000

1.000

1.000

0.935

60

0.974

0.982

1.000

1.000

1.000

1.000

1.000

0.772

80

0.518

0.635

0.949

0.943

0.956

0.946

0.944

0.547

MAR

Mean biasc

20

0.005

−0.101

−0.005

−0.012

−0.009

−0.005

−0.013

−0.412

40

0.001

−0.204

−0.031

−0.043

−0.032

−0.031

−0.042

−0.419

60

−0.015

−0.275

−0.038

−0.046

−0.028

−0.037

−0.046

−0.423

80

0.014

−0.349

−0.058

−0.068

−0.058

−0.058

−0.072

−0.415

Mean errorc

20

0.064

0.104

0.059

0.058

0.060

0.058

0.058

0.412

40

0.087

0.204

0.072

0.075

0.074

0.072

0.075

0.419

60

0.135

0.275

0.096

0.098

0.092

0.095

0.097

0.423

80

0.304

0.349

0.160

0.159

0.153

0.158

0.161

0.415

Coverage

20

0.965

0.727

0.963

0.967

0.962

0.965

0.964

0.000

40

0.952

0.334

0.958

0.940

0.947

0.951

0.935

0.000

60

0.948

0.237

0.950

0.924

0.953

0.950

0.918

0.004

80

0.944

0.356

0.935

0.918

0.943

0.941

0.926

0.161

Power

20

1.000

1.000

1.000

1.000

1.000

1.000

1.000

0.987

40

1.000

1.000

1.000

1.000

1.000

1.000

1.000

0.944

60

0.977

0.982

0.999

1.000

1.000

1.000

1.000

0.792

80

0.486

0.613

0.905

0.897

0.920

0.912

0.902

0.537

MNAR

Mean biasc

20

0.003

−0.125

−0.023

−0.021

−0.024

−0.023

−0.024

−0.411

40

−0.006

−0.250

−0.091

−0.072

−0.080

−0.091

−0.081

−0.417

60

−0.003

−0.288

−0.016

0.010

0.005

−0.017

0.003

−0.420

80

−0.026

−0.358

−0.186

−0.161

−0.186

−0.182

−0.176

−0.427

Mean errorc

20

0.067

0.128

0.063

0.063

0.066

0.063

0.063

0.411

40

0.112

0.250

0.113

0.102

0.107

0.113

0.107

0.417

60

0.150

0.288

0.103

0.105

0.106

0.104

0.103

0.420

80

0.456

0.367

0.253

0.237

0.258

0.252

0.241

0.428

Coverage

20

0.952

0.643

0.948

0.947

0.935

0.949

0.947

0.000

40

0.960

0.349

0.893

0.908

0.886

0.887

0.893

0.002

60

0.952

0.394

0.955

0.944

0.937

0.961

0.947

0.017

80

0.967

0.943

0.981

0.916

0.971

0.981

0.916

0.360

Power

20

1.000

1.000

1.000

1.000

1.000

1.000

1.000

0.973

40

0.998

0.985

1.000

1.000

1.000

1.000

1.000

0.826

60

0.942

0.898

0.999

0.997

1.000

0.996

0.999

0.738

80

0.256

0.094

0.358

0.527

0.394

0.364

0.519

0.331

  1. aAnalysis model A: complete case analysis (no multiple imputation [mi]); B: no outcome imputation, not included in mi model; C: no outcome imputation, outcome imputed in mi model; D: outcome imputed and included in mi model; E: outcome imputed and included in mi model but then observations where it was imputed are deleted; F as in C but also including a second correlated outcome in the mi model; G as in D but also including a second correlated outcome in the mi model; H as in D but the mi and analysis models do not include the covariate
  2. bMain models of interest, other models provided for comparison purposes
  3. cReported on log-odds scale and based on a true effect of log [2]