This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Research waste in diagnostic trials: a methods review evaluating the reporting of test-treatment interventions
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 13 July 2016
Accepted: 22 December 2016
Published: 24 February 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|13 Jul 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|20 Aug 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Christiana Naaktgeboren|
|20 Sep 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Miranda Langendam|
|30 Nov 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Lavinia Ferrante di Ruffano|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|30 Nov 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|16 Dec 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Lavinia Ferrante di Ruffano|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|16 Dec 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|22 Dec 2016||Editorially accepted|
|24 Feb 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12874-016-0286-0|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.