This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Test-treatment RCTs are susceptible to bias: a review of the methodological quality of randomized trials that evaluate diagnostic tests
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 13 July 2016
Accepted: 22 December 2016
Published: 24 February 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|13 Jul 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|30 Aug 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Daniël Korevaar|
|31 Aug 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Eunhee Kim|
|30 Nov 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Lavinia Ferrante di Ruffano|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|30 Nov 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|16 Dec 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Lavinia Ferrante di Ruffano|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|16 Dec 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|22 Dec 2016||Editorially accepted|
|24 Feb 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12874-016-0287-z|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.