Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Test-treatment RCTs are susceptible to bias: a review of the methodological quality of randomized trials that evaluate diagnostic tests

  • Lavinia Ferrante di Ruffano1,
  • Jacqueline Dinnes1,
  • Alice J. Sitch1,
  • Chris Hyde2 and
  • Jonathan J. Deeks1Email author
BMC Medical Research MethodologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:35

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0287-z

Received: 13 July 2016

Accepted: 22 December 2016

Published: 24 February 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
13 Jul 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
30 Aug 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Daniël Korevaar
31 Aug 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Eunhee Kim
30 Nov 2016 Author responded Author comments - Lavinia Ferrante di Ruffano
Resubmission - Version 2
30 Nov 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
16 Dec 2016 Author responded Author comments - Lavinia Ferrante di Ruffano
Resubmission - Version 3
16 Dec 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
22 Dec 2016 Editorially accepted
24 Feb 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12874-016-0287-z

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Biostatistics, Evidence Synthesis and Test Evaluation Research Group, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
(2)
PenTAG, Institute of Health Research, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK

Advertisement