This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Evaluation of biases present in the cohort multiple randomised controlled trial design: a simulation study
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 21 July 2016
Accepted: 18 January 2017
Published: 31 January 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|21 Jul 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|26 Aug 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Johanna van der Lee|
|30 Aug 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Arthur Allignol|
|7 Oct 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Jane Candlish|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|7 Oct 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|18 Oct 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Arthur Allignol|
|18 Oct 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Johanna van der Lee|
|23 Dec 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Jane Candlish|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|23 Dec 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|17 Jan 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Jane Candlish|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|17 Jan 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|18 Jan 2017||Editorially accepted|
|31 Jan 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12874-017-0295-7|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.