Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Evaluation of biases present in the cohort multiple randomised controlled trial design: a simulation study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
21 Jul 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
26 Aug 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Johanna van der Lee
30 Aug 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Arthur Allignol
7 Oct 2016 Author responded Author comments - Jane Candlish
Resubmission - Version 2
7 Oct 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
18 Oct 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Arthur Allignol
18 Oct 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Johanna van der Lee
23 Dec 2016 Author responded Author comments - Jane Candlish
Resubmission - Version 3
23 Dec 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
17 Jan 2017 Author responded Author comments - Jane Candlish
Resubmission - Version 4
17 Jan 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
18 Jan 2017 Editorially accepted
31 Jan 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12874-017-0295-7

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement