Skip to main content
Fig. 3 | BMC Medical Research Methodology

Fig. 3

From: Efficient confidence limits for adaptive one-arm two-stage clinical trials with binary endpoints

Fig. 3

Average length comparison among the three exact approaches (the RR-A approach, the RR-B approach, and the PV approach), for the 16 different configurations with π 1=π 0+20% when the AdaptiveS design is used. The sample space G 2 (left side) and the subsample space G 2(C I) (right side) are used in computing the 95% one-sided exact lower limits. An approach with a lower average length is preferable

Back to article page