This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Estimation of treatment preference effects in clinical trials when some participants are indifferent to treatment choice
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 16 August 2016
Accepted: 2 February 2017
Published: 20 February 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|16 Aug 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|25 Oct 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Diane Uschner|
|25 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tolulope Sajobi|
|15 Dec 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Stephen Walter|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|15 Dec 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|11 Jan 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Stephen Walter|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|11 Jan 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|2 Feb 2017||Editorially accepted|
|20 Feb 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12874-017-0304-x|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.