Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A comparison of analytic approaches for individual patient data meta-analyses with binary outcomes

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
29 Mar 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
22 Apr 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mark Simmonds
18 May 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Thomas Debray
6 Sep 2016 Author responded Author comments - Doneal Thomas
Resubmission - Version 2
6 Sep 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
23 Sep 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Thomas Debray
30 Sep 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mark Simmonds
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
31 Jan 2017 Author responded Author comments - Doneal Thomas
Resubmission - Version 4
31 Jan 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
2 Feb 2017 Editorially accepted
16 Feb 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12874-017-0307-7

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement