This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Generating evidence on a risk-based monitoring approach in the academic setting – lessons learned
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 18 November 2016
Accepted: 4 February 2017
Published: 14 February 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|18 Nov 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|5 Dec 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Cornelis van den Bogert|
|12 Dec 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Caroline Hurley|
|3 Jan 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Belinda von Niederhäusern|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|3 Jan 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|19 Jan 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Caroline Hurley|
|26 Jan 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Cornelis van den Bogert|
|1 Feb 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Belinda von Niederhäusern|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|1 Feb 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|4 Feb 2017||Editorially accepted|
|14 Feb 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12874-017-0308-6|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.