Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Generating evidence on a risk-based monitoring approach in the academic setting – lessons learned

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
18 Nov 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
5 Dec 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Cornelis van den Bogert
12 Dec 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Caroline Hurley
3 Jan 2017 Author responded Author comments - Belinda von Niederhäusern
Resubmission - Version 2
3 Jan 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
19 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Caroline Hurley
26 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Cornelis van den Bogert
1 Feb 2017 Author responded Author comments - Belinda von Niederhäusern
Resubmission - Version 3
1 Feb 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
4 Feb 2017 Editorially accepted
14 Feb 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12874-017-0308-6

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement