This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Participant retention practices in longitudinal clinical research studies with high retention rates
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 19 September 2016
Accepted: 11 February 2017
Published: 20 February 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|19 Sep 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|7 Oct 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Hanna Tolonen|
|24 Oct 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ann Christina Foldenauer|
|1 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Judith Poldervaart|
|8 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Andreas Eiset|
|8 Dec 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Martha Abshire|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|8 Dec 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|25 Dec 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Andreas Eiset|
|26 Jan 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Martha Abshire|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|26 Jan 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|11 Feb 2017||Editorially accepted|
|20 Feb 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12874-017-0310-z|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.