Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Participant retention practices in longitudinal clinical research studies with high retention rates

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
19 Sep 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
7 Oct 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Hanna Tolonen
24 Oct 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ann Christina Foldenauer
1 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Judith Poldervaart
8 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Andreas Eiset
8 Dec 2016 Author responded Author comments - Martha Abshire
Resubmission - Version 2
8 Dec 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
25 Dec 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Andreas Eiset
26 Jan 2017 Author responded Author comments - Martha Abshire
Resubmission - Version 3
26 Jan 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
11 Feb 2017 Editorially accepted
20 Feb 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12874-017-0310-z

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement