Assessing the impact of natural policy experiments on socioeconomic inequalities in health: how to apply commonly used quantitative analytical methods?
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 19 April 2016
Accepted: 2 March 2017
Published: 20 April 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|19 Apr 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|7 Sep 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Arielle Selya|
|4 Oct 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Murthy Mittinty|
|14 Nov 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Yannan Hu|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|14 Nov 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|25 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Arielle Selya|
|6 Dec 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Murthy Mittinty|
|12 Jan 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Yannan Hu|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|12 Jan 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|22 Feb 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Yannan Hu|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|22 Feb 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|2 Mar 2017||Editorially accepted|
|20 Apr 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12874-017-0317-5|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.