Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: The importance of censoring in competing risks analysis of the subdistribution hazard

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
9 Jun 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
5 Jul 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ronald Geskus
12 Jul 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Catherine Lesko
11 Aug 2016 Author responded Author comments - Mark Donoghoe
Resubmission - Version 2
11 Aug 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
19 Aug 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Catherine Lesko
21 Sep 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ronald Geskus
21 Dec 2016 Author responded Author comments - Mark Donoghoe
Resubmission - Version 3
21 Dec 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
24 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ronald Geskus
7 Feb 2017 Author responded Author comments - Mark Donoghoe
Resubmission - Version 4
7 Feb 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
23 Feb 2017 Author responded Author comments - Mark Donoghoe
Resubmission - Version 5
23 Feb 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
17 Mar 2017 Editorially accepted
4 Apr 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12874-017-0327-3

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement