Skip to content


Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Comparison of surveillance-based metrics for the assessment and monitoring of disease detection: simulation study about type 2 diabetes

  • Ralph Brinks1, 2Email author,
  • Annika Hoyer1,
  • Deborah B. Rolka3,
  • Oliver Kuss1, 4 and
  • Edward W. Gregg3
BMC Medical Research MethodologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:54

Received: 19 July 2016

Accepted: 23 March 2017

Published: 11 April 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting

Original Submission
19 Jul 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
31 Aug 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Chen Pin Wang
1 Dec 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Miran Jaffa
28 Dec 2016 Author responded Author comments - Ralph Brinks
Resubmission - Version 2
28 Dec 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
23 Mar 2017 Author responded Author comments - Ralph Brinks
Resubmission - Version 3
23 Mar 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
23 Mar 2017 Editorially accepted
11 Apr 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12874-017-0328-2

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

German Diabetes Center, Leibniz Institute for Diabetes Research at the Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Institute for Biometry and Epidemiology, Düsseldorf, Germany
University Hospital at the Heinrich-Heine-University Düesseldorf, Hiller Research Unit for Rheumatology, Düsseldorf, Germany
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Diabetes Translation, Georgia, USA
German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD), Munich–Neuherberg, Germany