Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Evidence synthesis to inform model-based cost-effectiveness evaluations of diagnostic tests: a methodological review of health technology assessments

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
6 Sep 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
15 Oct 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Patrick Bossuyt
24 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jared Campbell
21 Jan 2017 Author responded Author comments - Bethany Shinkins
Resubmission - Version 2
21 Jan 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
1 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jared Campbell
22 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Patrick Bossuyt
2 Mar 2017 Author responded Author comments - Bethany Shinkins
Resubmission - Version 3
2 Mar 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
23 Mar 2017 Author responded Author comments - Bethany Shinkins
Resubmission - Version 4
23 Mar 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
27 Mar 2017 Editorially accepted
14 Apr 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12874-017-0331-7

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement