This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Evidence synthesis to inform model-based cost-effectiveness evaluations of diagnostic tests: a methodological review of health technology assessments
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 6 September 2016
Accepted: 27 March 2017
Published: 14 April 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|6 Sep 2016||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|15 Oct 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Patrick Bossuyt|
|24 Nov 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jared Campbell|
|21 Jan 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Bethany Shinkins|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|21 Jan 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|1 Feb 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jared Campbell|
|22 Feb 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Patrick Bossuyt|
|2 Mar 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Bethany Shinkins|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|2 Mar 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|23 Mar 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Bethany Shinkins|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|23 Mar 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|27 Mar 2017||Editorially accepted|
|14 Apr 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12874-017-0331-7|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.