Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: An experimental comparison of web-push vs. paper-only survey procedures for conducting an in-depth health survey of military spouses

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
20 Oct 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
7 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Emily Geisen
17 Nov 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jenna Fulton
6 Jan 2017 Author responded Author comments - Hope McMaster
Resubmission - Version 2
6 Jan 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
25 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jenna Fulton
26 Jan 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Emily Geisen
3 Mar 2017 Author responded Author comments - Hope McMaster
Resubmission - Version 3
3 Mar 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
31 Mar 2017 Author responded Author comments - Hope McMaster
Resubmission - Version 4
31 Mar 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
4 Apr 2017 Editorially accepted
26 Apr 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12874-017-0337-1

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement