Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Grey literature in systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of the contribution of non-English reports, unpublished studies and dissertations to the results of meta-analyses in child-relevant reviews

BMC Medical Research MethodologyBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201717:64

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0347-z

Received: 20 January 2017

Accepted: 12 April 2017

Published: 19 April 2017

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
20 Jan 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
5 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Iván Florez
24 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Mark Simmonds
21 Mar 2017 Author responded Author comments - Lisa Hartling
Resubmission - Version 2
21 Mar 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
10 Apr 2017 Author responded Author comments - Lisa Hartling
Resubmission - Version 3
10 Apr 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
12 Apr 2017 Editorially accepted
19 Apr 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12874-017-0347-z

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Cochrane Child Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
(2)
Alberta Research Center for Health Evidence (ARCHE), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada

Advertisement