This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Assessing the complexity of interventions within systematic reviews: development, content and use of a new tool (iCAT_SR)
- Simon Lewin1, 2Email authorView ORCID ID profile,
- Maggie Hendry3,
- Jackie Chandler4,
- Andrew D. Oxman1,
- Susan Michie5,
- Sasha Shepperd6,
- Barnaby C. Reeves7,
- Peter Tugwell8,
- Karin Hannes9,
- Eva A. Rehfuess10,
- Vivien Welch11, 12, 13,
- Joanne E. Mckenzie14,
- Belinda Burford15,
- Jennifer Petkovic16,
- Laurie M. Anderson17,
- Janet Harris18 and
- Jane Noyes19
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 5 January 2017
Accepted: 14 April 2017
Published: 26 April 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|5 Jan 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|7 Feb 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lisa Susan Wieland|
|8 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Fujian Song|
|29 Mar 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Simon Lewin|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|29 Mar 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|12 Apr 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Simon Lewin|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|12 Apr 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|14 Apr 2017||Editorially accepted|
|26 Apr 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12874-017-0349-x|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.