Skip to main content

Table 1 Analyses of the divergence in BMI trajectories between T2DM adults and non-T2DM adults: assessment of Bayesian model complexity (effective number of parameters pD), and fit (deviance information criteria DIC) for each candidate model

From: Bayesian hierarchical piecewise regression models: a tool to detect trajectory divergence between groups in long-term observational studies

 

Model

Females

PP p-val

Males

PP p-val

Unconditional

A

26910 (2544)

0.47

19837 (2223)

0.55

T2DMgroup (int β0)

B

26670 (2366)

0.45

19741 (2270)

0.43

T2DMgroup (childhood slope β1)

C

26780 (2510)

0.6

19865 (2247)

0.58

T2DMgroup (Adulthood slope β2)

D

26701 (2401)

0.58

19828 (2242)

0.62

T2DMgroup (change point CP)

E

26076 (2777)

0.52

19762 (2213)

0.51

T2DMgroup (CP + β2)

F

26504(2430)

0.6

19860 (2271)

0.54

T2DMgroup (CP + β0)

G

26436 (2751)

0.55

19896 (2242)

0.45

T2DMgroup (all 4 parameters)

H

26532 (2978)

0.52

19920 (2435)

0.51

  1. Reported for each model are DIC (pD), and posterior predictive p-values (PP p-val). Best fitting models are indicated in bold characters