Skip to main content

Table 3 Analyses of inter-cohort differences in BMI trajectories: assessment of Bayesian model complexity (effective number of parameters pD), and fit (deviance information criteria DIC) for each candidate model

From: Bayesian hierarchical piecewise regression models: a tool to detect trajectory divergence between groups in long-term observational studies

 

Model

Females

PP p-val

Males

PP p-val

Unconditional

A

26910 (2544)

0.72

197837(2223)

0.52

Birth cohort (int β0)

B

26811 (2455)

0.70

19872 (2232)

0.70

Birth cohort (childhood slope β1)

C

26759 (2489)

0.34

19849 (2175)

0.63

Birth cohort (Adulthood slope β2)

D

26645 (2358)

0.67

19857 (2263)

0.68

Birth cohort (change point CP)

E

26395 (2599)

0.60

19862 (2211)

0.63

Birth cohort (CP and β 2 )

F

26390 (2671)

0.49

19877 (2255)

0.43

Birth cohort (CP, β2 and β1)

G

26783 (2775)

0.48

19945 (2342)

0.53

  1. Reported are: DIC (pD), and posterior predictive p-values (PP p-val). Best fitting models for each sex indicated in bold characters. (Convergence was not reached for the most complex model where all 4-trajectory parameters (i.e.β0, β1, β2, and CP) were adjusted for birth cohort effects)