Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Validity of self-reported weight and height: a cross-sectional study among Malaysian adolescents

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
8 Jan 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
12 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Inger Johanne Bakken
14 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Katrin Aasvee
12 Apr 2017 Author responded Author comments - Kee Chee Cheong
Resubmission - Version 2
12 Apr 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
1 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Inger Johanne Bakken
3 May 2017 Author responded Author comments - Kee Chee Cheong
Resubmission - Version 3
3 May 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
16 May 2017 Author responded Author comments - Kee Chee Cheong
Resubmission - Version 4
16 May 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
23 May 2017 Editorially accepted
2 Jun 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12874-017-0362-0

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement