This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Overview of systematic reviews of therapeutic ranges: methodologies and recommendations for practice
- Lewis Cooney1,
- Yoon K. Loke2,
- Su Golder3,
- Jamie Kirkham4,
- Andrea Jorgensen4,
- Ian Sinha†5 and
- Daniel Hawcutt†1, 6Email authorView ORCID ID profile
© The Author(s). 2017
Received: 14 February 2017
Accepted: 24 May 2017
Published: 2 June 2017
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|14 Feb 2017||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|3 Mar 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Lewis Cooney|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|3 Mar 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|26 Mar 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Daan Touw|
|9 Apr 2017||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Edoardo Aromataris|
|25 Apr 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Lewis Cooney|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|25 Apr 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|22 May 2017||Author responded||Author comments - Lewis Cooney|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|22 May 2017||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|24 May 2017||Editorially accepted|
|2 Jun 2017||Article published||10.1186/s12874-017-0363-z|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.