Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A DAG-based comparison of interventional effect underestimation between composite endpoint and multi-state analysis in cardiovascular trials

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
10 Nov 2016 Submitted Original manuscript
2 Dec 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sayan Dasgupta
15 Feb 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Prieto-Merino
16 Mar 2017 Author responded Author comments - Antje Jahn-Eimermacher
Resubmission - Version 2
16 Mar 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
4 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sayan Dasgupta
18 Apr 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - David Prieto-Merino
28 Apr 2017 Author responded Author comments - Antje Jahn-Eimermacher
Resubmission - Version 3
28 Apr 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
2 Jun 2017 Author responded Author comments - Antje Jahn-Eimermacher
Resubmission - Version 4
2 Jun 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
9 Jun 2017 Editorially accepted
4 Jul 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12874-017-0366-9

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement