Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Barriers to publishing in biomedical journals perceived by a sample of French researchers: results of the DIAzePAM study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
24 Jan 2017 Submitted Original manuscript
13 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dileep Rohra
17 Mar 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Laurence Le Cleach
10 May 2017 Author responded Author comments - Martin Duracinsky
Resubmission - Version 2
10 May 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 2
15 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Dileep Rohra
22 May 2017 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Laurence Le Cleach
1 Jun 2017 Author responded Author comments - Martin Duracinsky
Resubmission - Version 3
1 Jun 2017 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
26 Jun 2017 Editorially accepted
10 Jul 2017 Article published 10.1186/s12874-017-0371-z

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement